Poker News

George Epstein

My last column discussed some pros and cons for playing poker in a casino vs. a home game. Semi-pro Chris Cornell offered his perspective; and I promised to give you the thoughts on this subject of another poker player who frequents both home and casino games. Arizona Stu is a senior citizen who was extremely successful as a businessman and entrepreneur - and is a PokerShark. (During a recent visit to Los Angeles, he played three times at the Hustler Casino and batted 1000 - a winner every time.) He has much to add to what Chris posed as the pros and cons of the two different venues for playing poker.

Stu agrees that the costs (rakes) to play in a casino are somewhat high, although some home games require each player to contribute to the “house” to compensate for the food and cleaning up after the game. He prefers the greater variety of food choices at the casino, and being able to eat when he wants.

Like Chris and myself, Stu also doesn’t like the way most home games switch from one game of poker to another every round. He especially doesn’t like “Wild Card” games which he says are often confusing and “have nothing to do with figuring odds” or what he considers “Real Poker.” In home games, too much time is spent “fumbling around, gathering cards, reminding people to bet, shuffling, etc.”

In casino games, he likes being able to come and go whenever he chooses, on whatever evening best suits him; and he likes being able to select the game and stakes at which he wants to play. And sometimes he switches tables for whatever reason he decides. The chance to win some kind of a Jackpot (if offered at your favorite casino) - even if the odds are slight — adds some excitement: You might win a substantial amount of $$$! Finally, Stu notes that casino games have professional dealers, helping to move the game at a fast pace, making for a more enjoyable evening.

Not all home games are alike. Stu told us that there are two home games to which he is invited. One borders on a casino game, using two decks of cards to keep things moving, with players fully involved in the game and quite knowledgeable; “so it is enjoyable.” In that game, the “house” does take a significant amount from the players - analogous to the casino “rake.” The other home game is typical: changing games every round (”Dealer’s Choice”), with too many “Wild Card” games. He no longer plays at that game. . .

As for playing on the Internet, Arizona Stu recommends it only when using play money to help learning how to play or play better, or to sharpen one’s skills. To play in a casino or in a home game? In the final analysis, there are pros and cons. . . And there is also the option of playing on the Internet in the comfort of your own home. . . Tough decision! Meanwhile, I like it that I can go into a casino and play whenever it is convenient for me.. . See you at the casino!

So readers, what’s YOUR opinion?

Filed under: Poker News